Greg Uttinger
December 1, 2003
Introduction
When I ask incoming freshmen to list the cardinal doctrines of the faith, there
are two they never seem to remember. The Trinity, salvation by faith, the infallibility
of Scripture — these they get. They know we must believe that Jesus is
God and that He died and rose again. They sometimes remember to mention the Second
Coming. What does not occur to them are the creedal doctrines of the holy catholic
church and the general Resurrection. I suspect that my students are only too
typical of the twenty-first century Christian.
What Is Man?
Here’s another question: What makes man different from the animals? Most
children, indeed most adults, will say without blinking: “Man has a soul.” This
is incorrect. In fact, Scripture says that animals have, or are, souls. Genesis
1:20 speaks of “the moving creature that hath life,” and the word
for life is nephesh, a soul (cf. footnote 1). Furthermore, Ecclesiastes
speaks of the “spirit of the beast that goeth downward to the earth” in
contrast to the spirit of man that returns to God (3:21). To be sure, there
is a qualitative difference between the spirit of a man and that of the beast;
but the mere possession of a soul of some sort is not what Genesis makes the
watershed between man and beast. Oddly enough, most people seem to misread
or misremember what Genesis actually says about the human soul. Here is the
text:
And the LORD God formed man of the dust
of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils
the breath of life; and man became a living
soul. (Gen. 2:7)
Notice what Scripture does not say. It does
not say that God formed man’s body of
the dust, although that would be true enough.
It does not say that God formed a body of dust
and then placed a soul within it. The text
says that God formed man out of dust, from
material, chemical substance, and that God
then animated the man, made him a “living
soul.”1 The implications of
this are profound.
Consider this misreading of the Genesis account
written by a generally competent storyteller.
Inside of man’s body God put a living
soul.
When you love your mother, is it her hands
or feet that you love? No, it is something
inside of your mother that you love, something
that you cannot exactly see or touch. It
is her soul that you love ….
Suppose that in an accident you should lose
your arm. Would you be gone when your arm
is gone? No, you would still be here. Suppose
you were to lose your sight and become blind.
Would you be gone if your sight were gone?
No, though your sight would be gone, you
would still be here.2
And if you should lose your head? It is as
a physical being that man interacts with this
physical world and with those in it. Destroy
man’s body and he will be gone … from
this world, that is. And do we really want
to teach our little children that they don’t
love the mother that they can see and touch
and hug? The anthropology that Mrs. Vos is
describing here is not that of Scripture. It
is closer to Neoplatonism or gnosticism.
So, what does make man different from the animals? According to Scripture,
man is the image of God.
And God said, Let us make man in our image,
after our likeness: and let them have dominion
over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl
of the air, and over the cattle, and over
all the earth, and over every creeping thing
that creepeth upon the earth. So God created
man in his own image, in the image of God
created he him; male and female created he
them. And God blessed them, and God said
unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and
replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have
dominion over the fish of the sea, and over
the fowl of the air, and over every living
thing that moveth upon the earth (Gen. 1:26-28).
Each of us bears the image of God differently,
yet we each bear it truly. Sin has corrupted
that image, but not effaced it (Gen. 9:6; Jas.
3:9). In Christ that image is restored (Eph.
4:24; Col. 3:10). Now, God’s first instructions
to man connect his existence as God’s
image with his role in the physical creation.
It was as the image of God that man was to
fill the world, exercise dominion over the
lesser creatures, and subdue the earth. In
other words, man’s humanity is tied to
his existence and labors in this world. His
separation from this world is unnatural: it
is called death.
The Global Community
God’s first words to Adam and Eve spoke directly to man’s sensual
and biological nature. Those words amounted to “have children, have children,
have children.” Obviously, God wanted the earth full of people. It takes
a large population to run a planet, of course, but God was after more than
numbers. Hermits, even billions of them, cannot build a civilization or society.
But God’s command aimed at just that: a global community.
God is a community. He is One and Many, a
social Being. Therefore, He intends His image
for community. It was not good for the man
to be alone (Gen. 2:18). But the family was
only a starting point. Mankind was to spread
out across the globe, and in the process, families
would join in forming larger communities, all
united and interrelated by their love for God
and their dedication to the divine mandate.
And when at last the earth was full, then the
glory would begin.3 These were God’s
original expressed and implied intentions for
His creation. And these were the intentions
Satan sought to thwart in Paradise.
The Glory of God in Redemption
Did Satan succeed? We must say, No. God is still intent on building a global
community, a peculiar people who will inherit the earth (Mt. 5:5). This was
the promise to Abraham and to David (Gen. 12:3; Rom. 4:13; Ps. 2; 72). This
is the clear intent of the Great Commission (Mt. 28:18-20). This is what
John saw in the final chapters of the Apocalypse (Rev. 21-22). Indeed, this
is the gospel: the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the world (1 Jn.
4:14). The kingdom of heaven has come (Mt. 3; 13).
The Fall, then, did not force God to abandon
the goals He had set before mankind; it did,
however, place His methods of accomplishing
those goals far beyond the reach of human imagination
(1 Cor. 2:9).5 Because of the Fall,
God now glorifies Himself not merely in creation,
but in the much more glorious theme of redemption
(buying back the fallen world) through Jesus
Christ.6 But we must be clear: the
goal of redemption is not the rejection of
man or the earth; rather, it is the salvation
and restoration of both (Rom. 8): it is the
restitution of all things (Ac. 3:21).
The Holy Catholic Church
Some things have changed, however. Normal reproduction has failed us. The flesh
produces only flesh (Jn. 3:3-8). The family is fallen and needs redemption.
The community that God is creating is not the family, though it includes
families. Nor is it a political kingdom, though it will guide and embrace
political kingdoms (Rev. 21:24-26; 22:2). Jesus is building a new kind of
global community: He calls it His church. He said that the gates of hell
would not prevail against it (Matt. 16:13-19).7
It seems strange that a Christian should actually
need to commend the church to other Christians.
But that is where we have come. Satan has been
busy. So let’s look carefully at some
of the things that God says about the New Testament
church.
First, the church preaches the gospel. Faith
comes by hearing, and hearing by the word of
God, by preaching (Rom. 10:17). But preachers,
Paul argues, must be sent (vv. 14-15). Sent
by whom? By the church. The church is to ordain
and commission gospel preachers. Preacher or
missionary is not an office a man may take
to himself. While the Holy Spirit can use any
of us to bring the message of the gospel to
a lost soul,8 it is in the context
of the ordained preaching and teaching ministry
of the church that God works out the salvation9 of
His people (1 Cor. 1:18-21; Eph. 4:11-16).
Second, God adds “such as should be
saved” to the church (Acts 2:47). We
must think of more than the invisible church
here. On the day of Pentecost, those who were
saved were added to the visible church by baptism
and immediately joined in its life and worship
(v. 41ff). We read in Hebrews that we are not
to “forsake the assembling of ourselves
together” (10:25); rather we are to submit
to those who have the rule over us (13:17).
Christians are to be members of churches.
Third, the church is an organic, Spirit-filled
creation. She is the body of Christ. When Paul
uses that image in Ephesians 4 and 1 Corinthians
12, it is the visible church he has in mind,
the church with officers, ordinances, and formal
assemblies. Certainly, he speaks to the life
of the church beyond those assemblies, but
not apart from their pervading influence. It
is in the context of the visible church that
Christ is growing His body into full maturity
(Eph. 4:11-12). To speak pointedly, we do not
cut off, say, a finger and leave it on a shelf
with the hopes it will live and thrive. Life
exists only in the body.
Fourth, it is in the worship of the church
that Christ meets with His people and communicates
to them His resurrection life. He is present
in the preaching of the word and the sacraments
(1 Cor. 14:25; 10:16; Rev. 3:20). He is present
in the judicial actions of His officers (Mt.
18:15–20). He is present in His members
(1 Cor. 12). To walk away from the church is
to walk away from Jesus Christ.
The Westminster Confession speaks of the visible
church as “the house and family of God,
out of which there is no ordinary possibility
of salvation” (XXV:ii). “Ordinary
possibility,” the Confession says. Yes,
there are exceptions, from the thief on the
cross forward.10 But they are exceptions.
God normally saves His people in and through
the visible church. We may not willfully separate
ourselves from it. The Belgic Confession says
this:
We believe that since this holy assembly
and congregation is an assembly of the saved,
and apart from which there is no salvation,
that no one, of whatever estate and quality
he may be, has any right to withdraw himself
to live separate from it, but that all together
are obligated to join and unite themselves
with it, maintaining the unity of the Church … (XXVIII).
The church is the Lamb’s wife (Rev.
21:9), the body of Christ (Col. 1:18), the
temple of the Spirit (Eph. 2:21–22),
the pillar and ground of the truth (1 Tim.
3:15). The church is the holy city, the new
Jerusalem (Rev. 21:2), the very thing Abraham
was looking for (Heb. 11:10). God will not
dispense with her; God will not forget her.
The Resurrection
The doctrine of the church, therefore, implies the doctrine of the Resurrection.
God is not the God of the dead, but of the living (Mt. 22:32). Christ will
raise His church to life (1 Cor. 15; 1 Thes. 4:13-18). The gates of hell
(hades) will not prevail against her.
This was the gospel from the beginning. The first promise of grace in Genesis
pointed to the Resurrection (Gen. 3:15). Crushing the serpent’s head,
overturning the effects of the Fall, must involve the destruction of sin and
death; it must mean resurrection. Eve would be the mother of all living (Gen.
3:20). A spiritual or figurative resurrection will not answer the goal of God
in creation or in redemption. God made man of the dust of the ground, and that
dust He must raise to glory. No body, no complete man — and Satan wins.
It really is that simple.
Conclusion
When history is over, the rational creation will behold a saved world; that
is, they will see a church that has inherited the earth. And then the Resurrection
will translate that victory into eternal glory: the King and His bride will
live happily ever after.
Without the church, without the Resurrection,
Satan wins. Or put differently, if we do not
insist on “the holy catholic church” and “the
Resurrection of the body,” we miss the
whole point of what God is doing. We end up
with a different gospel. And in our generation,
some have done just that. May we not be among
them.
Notes
1. Later in Scripture the words for soul
acquire other meanings so that Christ can sharply
distinguish soul from body (Mt. 10:28). But
the older meaning is still at times valid.
When Scripture tells us that on the day of
Pentecost three thousand souls were added to
the church, we are to understand three thousand
persons, not three thousand disembodied spirits
(Ac. 2:41).
2. Catherine Vos, The Child’s
Story Bible: Old Testament, Genesis to Ruth (Edinburgh:
Banner of Truth Trust, 1984 rpt.), 20.
3. It is odd
how many commentators assume that if Adam had passed his probation, he would
have immediately received a glorified body and been taken into heaven. God’s
command assumes just the opposite. Adam and his children would have remained
on earth, working at their task, until it was complete. Complete glorification
lay at the end of the road. Along these lines, see Ransom’s
discussion with the Adam of Venus in C. S. Lewis’s Perelandra,
ch. 17.
4. According to Paul, the promise, “In thee shall nations be blessed,” was
the gospel (Gal. 3:8).
5. Tolkien pursues this theme in The Silmarillion with
regard to the adversary’s fall: “And thou, Melkor, shalt see that
no theme may be played that hath not its uttermost source in me, nor can any
alter the music in my despite. For he that attempteth this shall prove but
mine instrument in the devising of things more wonderful, which he himself
hath not imagined” (Boston:
Houghton Mifflin, 1977), 17.
6. In Scripture, the Kinsman-Redeemer freed
the bride from slavery and redeemed her lands
as well. See Rushdoony, Thy
Kingdom Come: Studies in Daniel and Revelation (np: Presbyterian
and Reformed Publishing Company, 1970), 137–139.
7. Christ does not make this
promise to the family or the State.
8. That is,
a lost person.
9. Not only their calling and conversion,
but their sanctification and perseverance: “In
the language of the New Testament salvation is a thing of the past, a thing
of the present, and a thing of the future … It is important to observe
this, because we are thus taught that ‘salvation’ involves a moral
condition which must have begun already, though it will receive its final accomplishment
hereafter. Godliness, righteousness, is life, is salvation.” —Lightfoot
quoted in Geoffrey B. Wilson 1 Corinthians: A Digest of Reformed Comment (London:
Banner of Truth Trust, 1971), 26f.
10. The Westminster Confession says of baptism: “Although
it be a great sin to contemn or neglect this ordinance, yet grace and salvation
are not so inseparably annexed unto it, as that no person can be regenerated
or saved without it, or that all that are baptized are undoubtedly regenerated” (XXVIII:
v).
Greg Uttinger teaches theology, history, and literature at Cornerstone Christian
School in Roseville, California. He lives nearby in Sacramento County with his
wife, Kate, and their three children. He may be contacted at paul_ryland@hotmail.com.
|